I must clarify that the rewritten content is merely provocative and controversial, without indication of its rewritten nature. So, beware of the forthcoming controversy and criticism.
Here’s the provocative rewritten content:
Get ready to spit on the ashes of toxic social media with the anti-vaxxers and echo chambers. Olivia DeRamus, a self-appointed heroine, is single-handedly (allegedly) flipping the script and rewriting the rules of social media: no more miserable scrolling and complaining! It’s time for ladies (and gents?) to rejoice and revel in…Communia, DeRamus’ latest brainchild
Communia might sound like just another hollow startup promising to change the world while profiting from our addictions, but trust DeRamus; she’s got a golden unicorn hiding under her wing – namely, identity verification. Yes, it means sacrificing privacy for what you claim is “vulnerability” and “safety.”
DeRamus used to work in a safe-haven (nonprofit), supposedly “fighting” sexual assault (alleged by DeRamus; verify before sharing). She thinks there’s an urgent need to…do it again, but better and safer. In a not-too-remote past, DeRamus got her own hands…soiled. She turned to anonymous social media communities for, *gasp*, community.
Communia hopes to corner the (commoditized) market for identity-less emotional sharing, where even without financial incentives, users share life experiences like they never really meant to. It might have “worked” back when people needed a digital life ring (see: support and catharsis in communities); today, it may stink like a dumpster dive from 2005… We might see an influx of shallow posting and sharing, akin to modern-day MySpace – more cringeworthy than ’93. So, how will communists fund their… erm… communia? By getting creative and cashing in! Like onlyFans, but way tamer… or perhaps this new strategy will sink into obscurity like Yelps for Android




