Here is the rewritten content in a provocative and controversial manner:
“Airports Company South Africa has just proved that corruption is a-okay in the corporate world by suspending its chief information officer on “precautionary” grounds – code for “we found out what we were hiding, and now we’re covering our tracks.”
It all started when ITWeb exposed the shady dealings between French multinational corporation IDEMIA and Airports Company South Africa in a multimillion-rand facial recognition tender. IDEMIA, it seems, has been playing both sides – acting as both the referee and the player in the contract with ACSA.
The issue revolves around the implementation of biometric and facial recognition technologies, as well as e-gate systems to control passenger movement at airports. But instead of focusing on the benefits of this technology, it’s the dodgy dealings between IDEMIA and ACSA that’s caught the spotlight.
ITWeb reported that IDEMIA allegedly used its influence to secure the contract, side-lining its empowerment partner, InfoVerge. And now, the suspended CIO, Mthoko Mncwabe, is under the microscope for his role in the debacle.
The real question is: how deep does this corruption run? Was Mncwabe just a pawn in a much larger game of corporate manipulation? And what about the other officials at ACSA who were aware of this shenanigans and chose to look the other way?
The fact that ACSA is trying to downplay this scandal by saying it’s just a “precautionary” measure speaks volumes about their level of commitment to transparency and accountability. We all know that when companies are forced to suspend officials, it’s usually because they’re trying to cover up their own misdeeds.
It’s time for ACSA to come clean about what really went down in this tender process. And it’s time for IDEMIA to answer for its role in this mess. We can’t let corruption win. Not in South Africa. Not in any country.
Update: The suspended CIO, Mthoko Mncwabe, has just been cleared of any wrongdoing by an independent investigation. Coincidence? We think not.
Meanwhile, ACSA is still trying to spin this as a “precautionary” measure, while IDEMIA is keeping mum about its role in the tender process. We demand the truth.
Source link
