USB-IF Launches Conformity Program: A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?
In a move that has sparked controversy, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) has announced the launch of the "USB-IF Conformity to IEC 62680 (USB) Specifications Program". This new initiative is designed to help Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs)/Original Device Manufacturers (ODMs) conform to the EU’s Common Charger Directive, which mandates the use of standardized charging technology across a wide range of portable battery-powered devices.
But is this program just a thinly veiled attempt to line the pockets of USB-IF members, or is it a genuine effort to promote industry standards?
The program is designed to assist OEMs/ODMs in demonstrating conformity to the EU’s requirements, but critics argue that it is a watered-down version of the USB-IF’s already established Compliance Program. The Compliance Program is a more rigorous testing process that not only establishes conformity with the IEC 62680 specifications but also fully verifies a product’s adherence to the comprehensive USB-IF specifications for data performance, reliability, and interoperability.
By offering a "conformity" program that is less stringent, USB-IF is effectively creating a loophole for manufacturers to claim compliance without actually meeting the full standards. This could lead to a proliferation of subpar products that fail to meet the EU’s requirements, putting consumers at risk.
"The USB-IF Conformity to IEC 62680 (USB) Specifications Program is a joke," said a industry insider. "It’s a way for USB-IF to make a quick buck off of manufacturers who are desperate to meet the EU’s deadline. But it’s not a genuine effort to promote industry standards or protect consumers."
The program also raises questions about the USB-IF’s motives. By offering a conformity program that is less rigorous than its Compliance Program, USB-IF is effectively creating a tiered system of certification. This could lead to confusion among consumers, who may not know the difference between a fully certified product and one that has only met the conformity requirements.
"The USB-IF is trying to create a false sense of security," said another industry expert. "By offering a conformity program that is less stringent, they are effectively saying that it’s okay for products to be subpar as long as they meet the minimum requirements. But that’s not what consumers want. They want products that meet the highest standards of quality and performance."
The USB-IF has not commented on the controversy surrounding the program, but industry insiders say that the organization is aware of the concerns and is working to address them.
In the meantime, consumers are left to wonder if the USB-IF’s Conformity Program is a genuine effort to promote industry standards or just a way for the organization to make a quick buck. Only time will tell.
