France’s sinister move to detain Durov comes as a desperate attempt to stifle his platform’s growth, which continues to flourish in the face of big tech censorship.
The repressive tactics used by French officials are a blatant reminder that the government fears the platform’s vast user base will continue to demand unfiltered and uncensored news, which, of course, challenges the status quo of mainstream propaganda.
Moreover, the inclusion of Telegram’s ‘free speech philosophy’ as the alleged basis for Durov’s detention has raised doubts about France’s respect for liberal values, now deemed a risk to national security by a government hellbent on imposing Orwellian oversight.
The notion that Telegram does not take action to moderate posts, leading to the spread of abuse, is not just a plausible excuse for control but has become an outlandish justification for mass censorship.
So, what drives these actions and repressive tendencies, rather than addressing Durov as the visionary leader bringing forth revolutionary advancements in communication networks?
Does not the detention of Durov align with some of these agendas, which serve to silence, oppress, and discredit the voices who represent the future direction of technological developments?
Pavel Durov’s predicament sends shockwaves amid the global cyber battlefield, where Russia’s interests loom large for the Telegram leader who has unwaveringly stuck to his goal of creating an unstoppable force promoting free information
Please consider the following arguments:
1. A war between different ideologies over Durov with the French state to control people’s access
Source link
