EXCLUSIVE: The REAL Reason Behind the Information Regulator’s Witch Hunt on Meta, Google, and X
As the gloves come off, the Information Regulator is expanding its probe into the South African election, targeting not only Meta Platforms, but also Google and the Elon Musk-owned X. The Regulator is claiming that all three companies refused to hand over information on their political interference in the election, citing a vague "international jurisdiction" argument.
Pansy Tlakula, the Chair of the Information Regulator, recently held a press briefing, where she slammed the three companies for their refusal to comply with the Promotion of Access to Information Act (Paia). According to Tlakula, Google has agreed to meet with the Regulator, but Meta and X have so far refused to cooperate.
But what’s really driving this probe? Is the Regulator truly concerned about the integrity of the democratic process, or is it just a witch hunt fueled by political biases?
Rumors are circulating that the Regulator is angling to fine these tech giants for non-compliance, and potentially even force them to disclose their data collection practices. But isn’t this just a draconian overreach of authority?
As one insider source revealed, "The Information Regulator is trying to flex its muscles and make a name for itself in the global tech community. They’re trying to establish themselves as a major player, but it’s a thinly veiled attempt to exert control over the information flow."
The stakes are high, with the likes of Meta, Google, and X at the epicenter of this controversy. Will the Regulator prevail, or will these tech giants push back against its overreaching demands?
Stay tuned for more on this developing story, and get ready to join the conversation on the future of data privacy and the war for control over the flow of information!
