The article claims that Vox Media and The Atlantic have made “shocking” deals with OpenAI, a company that claims to be “committed to responsible AI development”. However, behind closed doors, it seems like this “responsible” AI has actually been training on journalists’ own content, without their knowledge or consent. What’s more, OpenAI refuses to disclose the terms of the deals, leaving journalists and writers in the dark.
Writers at The Atlantic weren’t even given a heads-up, and they’ve been scrambling to find out what’s going on. Journalists at Vox Media aren’t much better off. OpenAI claims it’s training AI models to surface high-quality, credible news, but it’s all done behind a veil of secrecy.
But why should they care? Well, OpenAI could potentially use this “trained” content to write articles that sound identical to the ones produced by human writers. Can you imagine if OpenAI decided to replace you with one of its AI-generated articles, with nary a mention of where the content came from?
News guilds are pushing back against these deals, arguing that they infringe on journalists’ rights and could damage the credibility of the entire industry. Vox Media’s president, Pam Wasserstein, has been silent on the matter. Perhaps she’s too busy counting her new AI-generated ad revenue?
As for why these deals are so “shocking”, consider this: other major news outlets, like The Wall Street Journal and The Financial Times, have already signed similar deals. You know what’s even more shocking? OpenAI’s claims that its AI-powered chatbots won’t be able to write articles that mimic human voices… or so it says. After all, AI’s just getting more sophisticated, and before you know it, AI-generated content could be just as good as (if not better than) the real thing.
Journalists need to stand up and demand more transparency and accountability from these deals. They’re the ones producing the content, after all. And while it’s true that OpenAI promises to drive traffic back to the original sources, who’s to say they won’t try to manipulate that traffic flow for their own gain?
So what’s the solution? It’s simple: demand better, and fight back against these deals that put the future of journalism at risk.
Source link
