NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENT BETRAYAL: A SHOCKING new study is advocating for a RADICAL REDUCTION in breast cancer screenings, putting MILLIONS of women at risk of a deadly, late-stage diagnosis.
The so-called “WISDOM” trial, published in JAMA, dared to suggest that the LIFESAVING annual mammogram is no longer necessary for most women, pushing a controversial “risk-based” model that could DELAY critical early detection.
In a DANGEROUS experiment on over 28,000 women, researchers used genetic sequencing to label women as “low risk”—some were even told to SKIP ALL SCREENINGS until age 50. This reckless strategy treats human lives as mere data points.
ERIN ANDREWS HAD ‘NO SYMPTOMS’ BEFORE CANCER DIAGNOSIS, PUSHES FOR EARLY SCREENINGS
Outraged experts are BLASTING the study. Fox News medical contributor Dr. Nicole Saphier warns this approach “completely sidelines” the primary goal of screening: catching cancer EARLY, when survival rates exceed 90%. The study IGNORES early-stage cancers, raising the terrifying possibility that women will be diagnosed too late.
A new study suggests that annual mammograms may not be the only effective approach for preventing breast cancer. (iStock)
The research admits its own failure, noting the risk-based approach did NOT reduce unnecessary biopsies. Yet, it brazenly promotes scaling back proven screenings. This isn’t innovation; it’s a COST-CUTTING GAMBLE with women’s lives, fueled by a cold, algorithmic view of healthcare.
HIDDEN TYPE OF BREAST CANCER COULD BE EXPOSED BY NEW BREAKTHROUGH TECH
Dr. Saphier delivered a SCATHING rebuke: labeling women under 50 as “low risk” is “OUTDATED” as diagnoses SURGE in younger women. Are we now letting a genetic score decide who deserves a fighting chance?
The study’s authors claim their model is “safe,” but safe for whom? For insurance companies looking to slash costs? This is a SLIPPERY SLOPE toward rationed care, where your DNA dictates your access to prevention. The trusted annual mammogram is under DIRECT ATTACK.
The research, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), tested a risk-based breast cancer screening approach against standard annual mammography. (iStock)
This is more than a debate over methodology; it’s a CHILLING preview of a future where your health destiny is predetermined by a genetic algorithm. Will you trust a computer model to tell you when it’s finally “worth it” to check for cancer?
CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES
The fight for early detection is being abandoned in favor of a cold, calculated system that could leave countless women behind. The question every woman must now ask herself is terrifying: would you bet your life on a statistical model?
Author: Kayitsi.com
