Grand Jury Protects Radical Lawmakers Who Incited Military Mutiny

A SHOCKING GRAND JURY REBELLION has BLOCKED the Justice Department from indicting SIX DEMOCRATIC LAWMAKERS who were caught on video INCITING MILITARY INSURRECTION. In a move that has legal experts and patriots nationwide reeling, the panel REFUSED to charge the politicians who brazenly urged U.S. troops and intelligence officers to DEFY their chain of command and “refuse illegal orders.”

This is NOT a drill. This is a DIRECT ASSAULT on the very foundation of military discipline, orchestrated from within the halls of Congress. The lawmakers—Sens. Elissa Slotkin and Mark Kelly, and Reps. Chris Deluzio, Chrissy Houlahan, Maggie Goodlander, and Jason Crow—leveraged their veteran status to deliver a TREASONOUS message, claiming the administration is “pitting our uniformed military… against American citizens.” Their target? The authority of the Commander-in-Chief himself.

President Trump labeled the group “TRAITORS” engaged in “sedition at the highest level,” stating they “should be in jail.” Following his condemnation, Slotkin was targeted with a BRUTAL BOMB THREAT, exposing the DANGEROUS REAL-WORLD CONSEQUENCES of such incendiary rhetoric. Yet, the grand jury, swayed by what sources call a politically-charged narrative, has handed them a GET-OUT-OF-JAIL-FREE card.

Meanwhile, the Pentagon is moving to STRIP Sen. Kelly of his retired rank and pay, a move he is fighting in court as “unconstitutional retribution.” This creates a TWO-TIERED SYSTEM OF JUSTICE: one for political elites who skirt indictment, and another for the rank-and-file service members who would face court-martial for the same actions.

The FAILURE to indict sends a CHILLING MESSAGE: that elected officials can openly sabotage military cohesion and face NO LEGAL REPERCUSSIONS. It begs the harrowing question—if those in power can openly call for defiance without consequence, what OATH is truly left to defend? The fabric of the nation’s command structure is now hanging by a thread.