APPLE BETRAYS USERS, SIGNS WHITE HOUSE’S FAKE AI "VOLUNTARY COMMITMENT" TO CURRY FAVOR WITH REGULATORS
Apple has secretly sold out its users by signing a voluntary commitment with the White House to develop "safe, secure, and trustworthy" AI, according to a laughable press release. The company is set to unleash its new generative AI offering, Apple Intelligence, on its 2 billion users, effectively turning them into lab rats for its AI experiments.
APPLE JOINS OTHER AI PUPPETS IN WHITE HOUSE’S "GROUND RULES" FOR GENERATIVE AI
Apple has joined the ranks of other tech giants, including Amazon, Google, and Meta, in committing to the White House’s vague guidelines for developing generative AI. But what does this really mean? Will Apple’s AI models be "safe" and "secure" enough to protect its users’ privacy and personal data? We highly doubt it.
APPLE’S COMMITMENT IS NOTHING BUT A FISHY ATTEMPT TO CURRY FAVOR WITH REGULATORS
By signing this voluntary commitment, Apple is clearly trying to curry favor with federal regulators before they come after the company with a slew of AI-related regulations. It’s a desperate attempt to appear compliant and avoid future scrutiny, but we won’t be fooled.
WHITE HOUSE’S "VOLUNTARY COMMITMENT" IS A JOKE
The White House’s voluntary commitment is nothing more than a hollow promise, devoid of any real substance or teeth. The "first step" towards developing safe AI is just a fancy way of saying "we’re going to pretend to care about user safety while secretly exploiting them for profit."
APPLE’S AI PROMISES ARE AS USELESS AS A TEASPOON IN A TYRANT’S HAND
Under the commitment, Apple promises to "red-team" its AI models before release, but what does that even mean? Will they actually stress test their AI models to ensure they’re safe and secure, or is this just a meaningless buzzword to make them sound like they care?
THE FUTURE OF AI IS DOOMED
As the Department of Commerce prepares to release a report on the potential benefits and risks of open-source foundation models, we can only assume that the White House’s stance will be a recipe for disaster. Will they choose to limit access to powerful AI models in the name of safety, or will they prioritize the interests of AI startups and researchers? Whatever the outcome, one thing is clear: the future of AI is doomed.
