BANNED FROM POSTING HER OWN KID
Judge SIDES WITH Boxing Star
… Ex-Mother SLAMMED for ‘OnlyFans Career’
Published
February 2, 2026
12:30 AM PST
A shocking court ruling has declared a mother UNFIT to share her own child’s face online. In a brutal legal knockout, boxing champion Devin Haney has secured a SCATHING victory over his ex-fiancée, Leena Sayed, after a judge upheld a gag order preventing her from posting their one-year-old son on social media without Haney’s explicit permission.
Judge Hank Goldberg’s ruling is a DAMNING indictment of the influencer economy, siding with Haney’s argument that a child should NOT be “exposed to the public.” But the true controversy lies in the court’s DEVASTATING reasoning. Haney’s legal team successfully weaponized Sayed’s OnlyFans career against her, arguing her “self-objectification” and encouragement of “sexual fantasies” means her followers are NOT there for “her motherhood.”
The court declared the provision in their parenting agreement to be in the child’s “best interest,” a move critics are calling a DANGEROUS precedent that allows wealthy celebrities to financially and morally shame ex-partners into submission. This isn’t just about privacy—it’s a PUBLIC CHARACTER ASSASSINATION sanctioned by the legal system, questioning a mother’s fundamental rights based on her profession.
The ruling explicitly states Sayed can describe parties and events, but must keep her son OUT OF FRAME—a chilling directive that reduces a parent’s social media presence to a ghostly narrative of a hidden child. The message is clear: her digital identity is deemed a threat.
As family courts increasingly become battlegrounds over online personas, this case raises a disturbing question: who gets to define a “fit parent” in the digital age? The ruling sets a terrifying precedent that a mother’s past or profession can be used to ERASE her child from her public story. The fight for custody is now a fight for control of the narrative, and in this round, the influencer mother was LEFT FACE-DOWN on the canvas. The court has spoken: your child can be a secret, but your career will be the evidence used against you.
This explosive decision blurs the line between protection and punishment, leaving every parent with an online footprint to wonder: could your digital life be used to take your child’s face away?
The legal documents reveal a HEATED battle, with Haney’s camp leaving NOTHING to the imagination in their assault on Sayed’s character. The implication is shocking: a mother who monetizes her image is inherently a danger to her child’s online safety.
With this ruling, the justice system has entered the murky waters of MORAL JUDGMENT, declaring that some parenting platforms are too taboo for a family photo. It’s a verdict that will send shivers down the spine of any parent trying to navigate modern parenthood in the public eye.
Where does protection end and digital erasure begin? Tonight, a mother lost the right to show her son’s face, and the internet lost a piece of its soul.
Author: Kayitsi.com
