Thursday, October 3, 2024
15.1 C
Johannesburg

Social Media Giants Betray Youth: Enabling Suicide and Self-Harm


The Censorship Cabal: Meta, Snap, and TikTok Team Up to Silence Suicidal Thoughts

The tech giants are at it again, this time attempting to dictate what we can and can’t discuss online. Meta, Snap, and TikTok have collaborated on a new program called Thrive, which will allegedly help "stop the spread of graphic content" depicting or encouraging self-harm and suicide. But is this just a veiled attempt to stifle open conversations about mental health?

Thrive, backed by the Mental Health Coalition, claims to use secure signal sharing technology to identify and remove violating content. But what exactly does "violating content" mean? Will they be targeting more than just explicit self-harm and suicide content, or will they also crack down on discussions about mental health, suicide, and self-harm? And what about the chilling effect this will have on free speech?

The same signal sharing technology used in the Lantern program, designed to combat child abuse online, will now be used to monitor and censor mental health content. This raises more questions than answers. Who decides what content is violating? Will they be working with governments and law enforcement agencies to monitor and enforce their censorship?

Meta boasts that it’s already made it harder to find explicit self-harm and suicide content on its platform. But at what cost? Are they really leaving room for open discussions about mental health, or are they just paying lip service to the idea while quietly silencing those who dare to speak out?

According to Meta’s own charts, they take action on millions of pieces of suicide and self-harm content every quarter. But what happens to those who are censored? Are they truly protected, or are they simply being silenced? Last quarter, Meta restored an estimated 25,000 of those posts, mostly after a user appealed. But what about the ones who don’t have a voice?

The real question is: what’s behind this sudden interest in censorship? Is it a genuine attempt to protect users, or is it just another way for the tech giants to exert control over the narrative and silence dissenting voices?



Source link

Kayitsi.com
Author: Kayitsi.com

Hot this week

Pay What You Want: DStv’s Desperate Measure to Stay Relevant

BANKING ON THE CHEAP: Capitec's Dirty Secret Exposed In...

Bullied by the System

The Dark Underbelly of Corporate Power: How Evotel...

The Game that Hijacked History

Here's a rewritten version of the content with...

Satelite Sabotage: Does Africa’s Future Depend On Foreign Technology?

"Apartheid's Ghost Haunts African Telecoms: Racial Bias in...

The Death of Network Management as We Know It

The Network Telemetry Revolution: A Game-Changer for the...

Topics

Pay What You Want: DStv’s Desperate Measure to Stay Relevant

BANKING ON THE CHEAP: Capitec's Dirty Secret Exposed In...

Bullied by the System

The Dark Underbelly of Corporate Power: How Evotel...

The Game that Hijacked History

Here's a rewritten version of the content with...

Satelite Sabotage: Does Africa’s Future Depend On Foreign Technology?

"Apartheid's Ghost Haunts African Telecoms: Racial Bias in...

The Death of Network Management as We Know It

The Network Telemetry Revolution: A Game-Changer for the...

Windows 11: The Surveillance State

Here is the rewritten content in a provocative...

The Privileged 50: Unearthing the Uninvited Guests at the Table

Billion-Dollar Heist: South Africa's Elite Launch Scheme to...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img