X’s Backroom Betrayal: The Company Quietly Feeds Your Private Data into its AI Monster
In a shocking move, X, formerly Twitter, has silently enabled the default use of user data to train its new AI chatbot, Grok. This means that the company is now harvesting your private interactions, posts, and results without your consent, and feeding them into its latest creation.
But here’s the kicker: X’s attempt to justify this move by citing vague language about "continuous improvement" and "training" is a thinly veiled attempt to exploit the very people who make up the backbone of its platform. The Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) is "surprised" by this development, and it’s not hard to see why. The DPC is the EU’s privacy watchdog, and it’s been engaged in discussions with X about this issue for months. And yet, X has still gone ahead and pushed this change through without providing any real transparency or justification.
Grok, the AI chatbot in question, is being touted as a rival to OpenAI’s ChatGPT, but with a "rebellious" twist. But what’s truly rebellious is X’s willingness to ignore the fundamental principles of data protection and user privacy. The company’s attempts to use its users’ data without consent is a clear violation of the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
But don’t just take our word for it. The language used by X is deliberately ambiguous, leaving users unsure about what exactly is being done with their data. Is it being used for training the AI chatbot? Or is it being used for something more sinister? The answer is anyone’s guess.
X’s silence on this issue is deafening. The company has refused to comment on the legal basis for processing European users’ data, instead sending a generic automated response claiming they’re "busy now, please check back later." It’s clear that X is trying to sweep this issue under the rug, but it won’t work.
The public has a right to know what’s being done with their data, and X needs to come clean about its intentions. Will they continue to prioritize profit over people’s privacy? Only time will tell.




